# Solving Leetcode Interviews in Seconds with AI: Check if it is Possible to Split Array


	# Introduction
	In this blog post, we will explore how to solve the LeetCode problem "2811" using AI. LeetCode is a popular platform for preparing for coding interviews, and with the help of AI tools like [Chatmagic](https://www.chatmagic.app), we can generate solutions quickly and efficiently - helping you pass the interviews and get the job offer without having to study for months.

	# Problem Statement
	> You are given an array nums of length n and an integer m. You need to determine if it is possible to split the array into n arrays of size 1 by performing a series of steps. An array is called good if:  The length of the array is one, or The sum of the elements of the array is greater than or equal to m.  In each step, you can select an existing array (which may be the result of previous steps) with a length of at least two and split it into two arrays, if both resulting arrays are good. Return true if you can split the given array into n arrays, otherwise return false.   Example 1:  Input: nums = [2, 2, 1], m = 4 Output: true Explanation:  Split [2, 2, 1] to [2, 2] and [1]. The array [1] has a length of one, and the array [2, 2] has the sum of its elements equal to 4 >= m, so both are good arrays. Split [2, 2] to [2] and [2]. both arrays have the length of one, so both are good arrays.   Example 2:  Input: nums = [2, 1, 3], m = 5 Output: false Explanation: The first move has to be either of the following:  Split [2, 1, 3] to [2, 1] and [3]. The array [2, 1] has neither length of one nor sum of elements greater than or equal to m. Split [2, 1, 3] to [2] and [1, 3]. The array [1, 3] has neither length of one nor sum of elements greater than or equal to m.  So as both moves are invalid (they do not divide the array into two good arrays), we are unable to split nums into n arrays of size 1.  Example 3:  Input: nums = [2, 3, 3, 2, 3], m = 6 Output: true Explanation:  Split [2, 3, 3, 2, 3] to [2] and [3, 3, 2, 3]. Split [3, 3, 2, 3] to [3, 3, 2] and [3]. Split [3, 3, 2] to [3, 3] and [2]. Split [3, 3] to [3] and [3].     Constraints:  1 <= n == nums.length <= 100 1 <= nums[i] <= 100 1 <= m <= 200  

	# Explanation
	Here's the breakdown of the solution:

*   **High-Level Approach:** The problem can be solved using dynamic programming. We can define a DP table `dp[i][j]` which indicates whether the subarray `nums[i:j+1]` can be split into single-element arrays. The base cases are when the subarray has length 1 (trivially true) or the sum of the subarray is greater than or equal to `m` (also true). For other cases, we iterate through all possible split points `k` within the subarray `[i, j]` and check if both subarrays `nums[i:k+1]` and `nums[k+1:j+1]` can be split.
*   **Complexity:**
    *   Runtime: O(n^3) - due to the three nested loops in the dynamic programming solution.
    *   Storage: O(n^2) - for the dp table.

	
	# Code
	```python
	def canSplit(nums, m):
    n = len(nums)
    dp = [[False] * n for _ in range(n)]

    for i in range(n):
        dp[i][i] = True

    for length in range(2, n + 1):
        for i in range(n - length + 1):
            j = i + length - 1
            subarray_sum = sum(nums[i:j+1])
            if subarray_sum >= m:
                dp[i][j] = True
                continue

            for k in range(i, j):
                if dp[i][k] and dp[k+1][j]:
                    dp[i][j] = True
                    break

    return dp[0][n-1]
	```