Skip to main content

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Solving Leetcode Interviews in Seconds with AI: Maximize Total Cost of Alternating Subarrays

Updated
4 min read

Introduction

In this blog post, we will explore how to solve the LeetCode problem "3196" using AI. LeetCode is a popular platform for preparing for coding interviews, and with the help of AI tools like Chatmagic, we can generate solutions quickly and efficiently - helping you pass the interviews and get the job offer without having to study for months.

Problem Statement

You are given an integer array nums with length n. The cost of a subarray nums[l..r], where 0 <= l <= r < n, is defined as: cost(l, r) = nums[l] - nums[l + 1] + ... + nums[r] * (−1)r − l Your task is to split nums into subarrays such that the total cost of the subarrays is maximized, ensuring each element belongs to exactly one subarray. Formally, if nums is split into k subarrays, where k > 1, at indices i1, i2, ..., ik − 1, where 0 <= i1 < i2 < ... < ik - 1 < n - 1, then the total cost will be: cost(0, i1) + cost(i1 + 1, i2) + ... + cost(ik − 1 + 1, n − 1) Return an integer denoting the maximum total cost of the subarrays after splitting the array optimally. Note: If nums is not split into subarrays, i.e. k = 1, the total cost is simply cost(0, n - 1). Example 1: Input: nums = [1,-2,3,4] Output: 10 Explanation: One way to maximize the total cost is by splitting [1, -2, 3, 4] into subarrays [1, -2, 3] and [4]. The total cost will be (1 + 2 + 3) + 4 = 10. Example 2: Input: nums = [1,-1,1,-1] Output: 4 Explanation: One way to maximize the total cost is by splitting [1, -1, 1, -1] into subarrays [1, -1] and [1, -1]. The total cost will be (1 + 1) + (1 + 1) = 4. Example 3: Input: nums = [0] Output: 0 Explanation: We cannot split the array further, so the answer is 0. Example 4: Input: nums = [1,-1] Output: 2 Explanation: Selecting the whole array gives a total cost of 1 + 1 = 2, which is the maximum. Constraints: 1 <= nums.length <= 105 -109 <= nums[i] <= 109

Explanation

Here's the breakdown of the solution:

  • Dynamic Programming: Use dynamic programming to store the maximum cost achievable up to each index. The state dp[i] represents the maximum cost of splitting the array nums[0...i].

  • Transitions: At each index i, consider two options: either include nums[i] in the previous subarray, or start a new subarray with nums[i]. Calculate the cost of each option and choose the one that maximizes the total cost.

  • Optimization: Efficiently calculate the cost of subarrays by pre-computing prefix sums of alternating signs. This avoids redundant calculations within the inner loop of the dynamic programming algorithm.

  • Runtime Complexity: O(n)

  • Storage Complexity: O(n)

Code

    def max_total_cost(nums):
    """
    Calculates the maximum total cost of splitting the array into subarrays.

    Args:
      nums: A list of integers.

    Returns:
      The maximum total cost of the subarrays.
    """

    n = len(nums)
    dp = [0] * n  # dp[i] stores the max cost of splitting nums[0...i]
    dp[0] = nums[0]

    if n == 1:
        return dp[0]

    # alt_sum[i] = nums[0] - nums[1] + nums[2] ... +/- nums[i]
    alt_sum = [0] * n
    alt_sum[0] = nums[0]
    for i in range(1, n):
        alt_sum[i] = alt_sum[i - 1] + nums[i] * (1 if (i % 2 == 0) else -1)

    dp[0] = nums[0]
    for i in range(1, n):
        # Option 1: Extend the previous subarray. Cost: nums[0] - nums[1] + ... +/- nums[i]
        dp[i] = alt_sum[i]

        # Option 2: Start a new subarray at nums[i]. Iterate through all possible split points
        for j in range(i):
            cost_prev = dp[j]
            cost_new = alt_sum[i] - alt_sum[j]
            if (j + 1) % 2 != 0:
                cost_new = alt_sum[i] + alt_sum[j] - 2 * alt_sum[j]
            dp[i] = max(dp[i], cost_prev + (nums[i] if (i - (j + 1)) % 2 == 0 else -nums[i]))

        #Option 3: Iterating and splitting at each index
        for j in range(i):
            current_cost = dp[j]
            sub_cost = 0
            sign = 1 if (j+1)%2 == 0 else -1
            for k in range(j+1, i + 1):
              sub_cost += nums[k] * sign
              sign *= -1
            dp[i] = max(dp[i], current_cost + sub_cost)
    return dp[n - 1]

More from this blog

C

Chatmagic blog

2894 posts