Solving Leetcode Interviews in Seconds with AI: Minimum Positive Sum Subarray
Introduction
In this blog post, we will explore how to solve the LeetCode problem "3364" using AI. LeetCode is a popular platform for preparing for coding interviews, and with the help of AI tools like Chatmagic, we can generate solutions quickly and efficiently - helping you pass the interviews and get the job offer without having to study for months.
Problem Statement
You are given an integer array nums and two integers l and r. Your task is to find the minimum sum of a subarray whose size is between l and r (inclusive) and whose sum is greater than 0. Return the minimum sum of such a subarray. If no such subarray exists, return -1. A subarray is a contiguous non-empty sequence of elements within an array. Example 1: Input: nums = [3, -2, 1, 4], l = 2, r = 3 Output: 1 Explanation: The subarrays of length between l = 2 and r = 3 where the sum is greater than 0 are: [3, -2] with a sum of 1 [1, 4] with a sum of 5 [3, -2, 1] with a sum of 2 [-2, 1, 4] with a sum of 3 Out of these, the subarray [3, -2] has a sum of 1, which is the smallest positive sum. Hence, the answer is 1. Example 2: Input: nums = [-2, 2, -3, 1], l = 2, r = 3 Output: -1 Explanation: There is no subarray of length between l and r that has a sum greater than 0. So, the answer is -1. Example 3: Input: nums = [1, 2, 3, 4], l = 2, r = 4 Output: 3 Explanation: The subarray [1, 2] has a length of 2 and the minimum sum greater than 0. So, the answer is 3. Constraints: 1 <= nums.length <= 100 1 <= l <= r <= nums.length -1000 <= nums[i] <= 1000
Explanation
Here's the solution to the problem:
- Prefix Sum Optimization: Calculate prefix sums to efficiently compute the sum of any subarray in O(1) time.
- Sliding Window with Minimum Tracking: Iterate through all possible subarray lengths between
landr. Use a sliding window approach within each length to compute subarray sums and track the minimum positive sum encountered so far. Early Exit: If a positive sum is not found after checking all subarrays, return -1.
Runtime Complexity: O(n*r) where n is the length of nums and r is the upper bound of subarray size. Storage Complexity: O(n) due to the prefix sum array.
Code
def min_subarray_sum(nums, l, r):
n = len(nums)
prefix_sum = [0] * (n + 1)
for i in range(n):
prefix_sum[i + 1] = prefix_sum[i] + nums[i]
min_sum = float('inf')
found = False
for length in range(l, r + 1):
for i in range(n - length + 1):
subarray_sum = prefix_sum[i + length] - prefix_sum[i]
if subarray_sum > 0:
min_sum = min(min_sum, subarray_sum)
found = True
if found:
return min_sum
else:
return -1