Solving Leetcode Interviews in Seconds with AI: Recover the Original Array
Introduction
In this blog post, we will explore how to solve the LeetCode problem "2122" using AI. LeetCode is a popular platform for preparing for coding interviews, and with the help of AI tools like Chatmagic, we can generate solutions quickly and efficiently - helping you pass the interviews and get the job offer without having to study for months.
Problem Statement
Alice had a 0-indexed array arr consisting of n positive integers. She chose an arbitrary positive integer k and created two new 0-indexed integer arrays lower and higher in the following manner: lower[i] = arr[i] - k, for every index i where 0 <= i < n higher[i] = arr[i] + k, for every index i where 0 <= i < n Unfortunately, Alice lost all three arrays. However, she remembers the integers that were present in the arrays lower and higher, but not the array each integer belonged to. Help Alice and recover the original array. Given an array nums consisting of 2n integers, where exactly n of the integers were present in lower and the remaining in higher, return the original array arr. In case the answer is not unique, return any valid array. Note: The test cases are generated such that there exists at least one valid array arr. Example 1: Input: nums = [2,10,6,4,8,12] Output: [3,7,11] Explanation: If arr = [3,7,11] and k = 1, we get lower = [2,6,10] and higher = [4,8,12]. Combining lower and higher gives us [2,6,10,4,8,12], which is a permutation of nums. Another valid possibility is that arr = [5,7,9] and k = 3. In that case, lower = [2,4,6] and higher = [8,10,12]. Example 2: Input: nums = [1,1,3,3] Output: [2,2] Explanation: If arr = [2,2] and k = 1, we get lower = [1,1] and higher = [3,3]. Combining lower and higher gives us [1,1,3,3], which is equal to nums. Note that arr cannot be [1,3] because in that case, the only possible way to obtain [1,1,3,3] is with k = 0. This is invalid since k must be positive. Example 3: Input: nums = [5,435] Output: [220] Explanation: The only possible combination is arr = [220] and k = 215. Using them, we get lower = [5] and higher = [435]. Constraints: 2 * n == nums.length 1 <= n <= 1000 1 <= nums[i] <= 109 The test cases are generated such that there exists at least one valid array arr.
Explanation
Here's the breakdown of the approach, complexities, and the Python code:
High-Level Approach:
- Sort the input array
nums. Iterate through the sortednumsand consider each element as a potentiallower[0]. - For each potential
lower[0], deducekusing the fact thathigher[0]must also exist innums. If a validkis found, reconstruct thelowerandhigherarrays and verify if they match the inputnums. - If a valid
arris found, return it.
- Sort the input array
Complexity Analysis:
- Runtime Complexity: O(n^2), where n is the length of the array
arr(nums length is 2n). Sorting takes O(n log n), and the nested loops within thecheckfunction can contribute to O(n^2) in the worst case. - Storage Complexity: O(n) for storing the potential
arr.
- Runtime Complexity: O(n^2), where n is the length of the array
Code
def recover_array(nums):
nums.sort()
n = len(nums) // 2
def check(first_lower):
k = -1
for j in range(1, 2 * n):
potential_k = (nums[j] - first_lower) // 2
if (nums[j] - first_lower) % 2 == 0 and potential_k > 0:
k = potential_k
break
if k == -1:
return None
lower = []
higher = []
arr = []
counts = {}
for num in nums:
counts[num] = counts.get(num, 0) + 1
lower.append(first_lower)
counts[first_lower] -= 1
for _ in range(n - 1):
found_pair = False
for num in nums:
if counts.get(num,0) > 0 and num > lower[-1]:
if (num - lower[-1]) % 2 == 0 and (num - lower[-1])//2 == k :
lower.append(lower[-1] + 2*k)
counts[lower[-1]] -= 1
found_pair = True
break
if not found_pair:
return None
for val in lower:
arr.append(val + k)
potential_lower = []
potential_higher = []
for val in arr:
potential_lower.append(val-k)
potential_higher.append(val+k)
combined = potential_lower + potential_higher
combined.sort()
if combined == nums:
return arr
else:
return None
for i in range(n):
result = check(nums[0])
if result:
return result
return None