Solving Leetcode Interviews in Seconds with AI: Sum of K Subarrays With Length at Least M
Introduction
In this blog post, we will explore how to solve the LeetCode problem "3473" using AI. LeetCode is a popular platform for preparing for coding interviews, and with the help of AI tools like Chatmagic, we can generate solutions quickly and efficiently - helping you pass the interviews and get the job offer without having to study for months.
Problem Statement
You are given an integer array nums and two integers, k and m. Return the maximum sum of k non-overlapping subarrays of nums, where each subarray has a length of at least m. Example 1: Input: nums = [1,2,-1,3,3,4], k = 2, m = 2 Output: 13 Explanation: The optimal choice is: Subarray nums[3..5] with sum 3 + 3 + 4 = 10 (length is 3 >= m). Subarray nums[0..1] with sum 1 + 2 = 3 (length is 2 >= m). The total sum is 10 + 3 = 13. Example 2: Input: nums = [-10,3,-1,-2], k = 4, m = 1 Output: -10 Explanation: The optimal choice is choosing each element as a subarray. The output is (-10) + 3 + (-1) + (-2) = -10. Constraints: 1 <= nums.length <= 2000 -104 <= nums[i] <= 104 1 <= k <= floor(nums.length / m) 1 <= m <= 3
Explanation
Here's a solution that addresses the problem efficiently:
- Dynamic Programming: Use a 3D DP table
dp[i][j][l]to store the maximum sum achievable usingjsubarrays considering elements up to indexi, wherelindicates whether the last element is part of a chosen subarray or not. - Iteration and Transition: Iterate through the array and the number of subarrays. Update the DP table based on whether we extend a previous subarray, start a new one, or skip the current element. The condition
i >= (j * m -1)ensures there are sufficient elements to form j subarrays. Optimization: Since the last element can be either included or excluded from a subarray, the value of 'l' is just 0 or 1.
Runtime Complexity: O(n k m), where n is the length of
nums, k is the number of subarrays, and m is the minimum length of each subarray. Storage Complexity: O(n k 2) which simplifies to O(n*k).
Code
def maxSumSubarrays(nums, k, m):
n = len(nums)
# dp[i][j][l]: max sum using j subarrays up to index i,
# where l=1 if nums[i] is part of a subarray, l=0 otherwise
dp = [[[float('-inf')] * 2 for _ in range(k + 1)] for _ in range(n + 1)]
# Base case: 0 subarrays with 0 elements have a sum of 0
dp[0][0][0] = 0
for i in range(1, n + 1):
for j in range(k + 1):
# Option 1: Don't include nums[i-1] in any subarray
dp[i][j][0] = max(dp[i-1][j][0], dp[i-1][j][1])
# Option 2: Include nums[i-1] as part of an existing subarray
if j > 0:
current_sum = 0
for length in range(1, i + 1): # Iterate through possible lengths of the last subarray
if length >= m:
current_sum = sum(nums[i-length:i])
if i-length == 0:
dp[i][j][1] = max(dp[i][j][1],current_sum)
else:
dp[i][j][1] = max(dp[i][j][1], dp[i-length][j-1][0] + current_sum, dp[i-length][j-1][1] + current_sum)
return max(dp[n][k][0], dp[n][k][1])